• Home
  • About
  • Books
  • The Battle of Cowpens
    • Cavalry
    • Artillery
    • Infantry
  • Musketry
  • Napoleon vs. Washington
    • Introduction
    • Historical Context
    • Tactics
    • Strategy: Napoleon
    • Strategy: Washington
    • Leadership

Twistification

~ All Things Revolutionary War

Twistification

Category Archives: Daniel Morgan

Cowpens 2014

25 Saturday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens

≈ Leave a comment

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Another cold yet sunny day greeted us at Cowpens this year.  The cold probably effected the turnout, as there were noticeably fewer reenactors this time around. Wesley and I ran into a few of the 2nd Carolina Regiment that we joined at the Battle of the Hook. It was great to see those guys.

My only regret this year was a clip I took of Park Ranger Will Caldwell. His tour of the battlefield was fantastic, however the wind completely destroyed the audio in the clip I took of him. SO disappointed with this. I was looking to add another clip similar to this one for the summary. Yet try as I might, I could not get a clear audio of his voice.

I did however make a new contact and hope to post a little on this mini cannon I came across that was owned by Eddie Davis.

Until then, enjoy the photos here. More at the flicker page here as well. 

Cowpens Countdown

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

18th Century Artillery

Three days until Cowpens!

Here are a few more tidbits from previous Cowpens posts.

Here are a few common questions Chris gets during the reenactment…

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at teh January 1781 battle.
christopherrucker@msn.com

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at the January 1781 battle.  Here he provides some of the common queries his crew receives at the battle’s annual anniversary.

Volunteers and spectators can share their favorite questions with Chris at christopherrucker@msn.com

Questions we Frequently Hear:

1. “How far does the cannon shoot?” 

Answer: A battle’s winner is not decided like a spitting contest. The more germane question should be: what is the effective range of the cannon?  This 3 pounder can hit targets which are hundreds of yards more distant than the range of a musket, which is why the artillery rules the battlefield.

2.  “What does the cannon shoot?”

Answer: It is called a 3 pounder because it shoots primarily a solid iron ball weighing three pounds. A 6 pounder shoots a six pound ball, etc. The gun can also shoot canister, which is a tin can containing musket balls; the can disintegrates at the cannon’s mouth, the balls producing an effect akin to a large shotgun. Canister is a very effective antipersonnel round at close ranges.

3.  “Are you shooting cannon balls today?”

Answer:  There are people and vehicles and houses not very far beyond the clump of trees in our front. This is not a video game. We cannot shoot projectiles which would endanger lives and property.

4.  “Did you fight in the war?”

Answer: No, but my friend over there with the sponge-rammer was personal friends with Gen. Lafayette, and you should go over and ask him all about the general’s children.

5.  “How many people will a cannon ball go through before it stops?”

Answer: We have not conducted such research. I suspect that we could not find enough volunteers to arrive at an acceptable answer. Several, surely. Many, possibly. Depends on the range.

6.  “Are you hot (cold) in those costumes?” 

Answer:  Costumes are what you wear on Halloween. We are wearing uniforms. The two cannons here at the Cowpens were British, captured by the Americans, some of whom were regulars, some militia. Therefore, our six crew members are wearing Continental uniforms, British uniforms, and back country civilian garb as examples of what were worn during the battle.

7. “How much does the cannon weigh?” 

Answer:  There is a numeric code on the breech which lists the weight in hundred weights (112 pounds), quarters of a hundred weight, and pounds. The total is 206 pounds for the barrel. We have carried the carriage, without the barrel, with eight men. It weighs much more than the barrel, and soldiers could not have carried it very far, in what was then called “The Irish Method.”

8.  “Does the Park Service pay you?” 

Answer:  The volunteers here have provided their own uniforms, arms, accoutrements, tents, etc. We are here because we love history, and love to teach. We are paid by the satisfaction of questions answered, and curiosity kindled. Your thanks and the appreciation of the Park Service personnel keeps us coming back.

9.  “Did you sleep here in tents last night?” 

Answer: Some of us did. Some came directly from home, and will return home after the battle to a warm featherbed. Just like the militia was wont to do in 1781.

10.  “Why is this cannon yellow, and the other one over there is black?” 

Answer:  This gun is made of bronze, which is an alloy of copper and primarily tin. That other gun is made of iron. Bronze was lighter, so was valued over iron, since it required less horseflesh and manpower to maneuver than an iron gun of the same size.

11.  “Why is this gun called a Grasshopper?” 

Answer:  Soldiers have always invented nicknames for their weapons. We suspect that the gun’s recoil in the tall grass suggested the hopping motion of a grasshopper.

12.  “Is that a real cannon?” 

Answer:  Please come and touch the cannon after we fire, to confirm that it is not a figment of your imagination. If you mean to differentiate between an original or a reproduction, this is one of a pair of repros given to the USA on our Bicentennial by the British. Pretty magnanimous of the Brits, seeing as how we took the originals from them in battle, every one of their cannoneers dying at his post to defend the guns. A point of honor in the artillery is to never surrender the piece.

13.  “What’s a “piece,” anyway?”

Answer:  The entire weapon is called the “piece” or “the gun.”  The barrel is the “tube,” which sits on the wheeled platform called the “carriage.” The piece was drawn by horse, or could be manipulated short distances on the battlefield by men called “mattrosses,” wielding ropes. The advantage of this small Grasshopper is its portability; it could negotiate the trackless back country without being mired in mud which would immobilize larger cannons, and it could be broken down into its components for transport on horseback, if needed.

14.  “If the gun fires a solid ball, how come in the movies the cannon balls blow up when they hit?”

Answer:  Please do not rely on Hollywood for your history lessons. A ball from a relatively long “gun” such as the 3 pounder travels a low trajectory, spending a short time in flight, too brief for a fused, hollow, explosive shell. A shorter mortar, or a howitzer, throws its projectiles at a higher trajectory, which allows enough time for the fuse in their hollow, powder-filled shells to explode the projectile over the target. Contact fuses were not used in the Revolutionary War, so shells didn’t explode on contact.

15.  “Is your sword sharp?”

Answer: My sword is seldom used for battle. The officer gives both a verbal and visual command to the man who fires the cannon. In the din of battle, a spoken command might be missed, so the officer lowers his raised sword as he verbally commands “Fire.”

16.  “Is that water bucket for the horses?” 

Answer: That is a “sponge bucket,” used to dampen the sponge which is introduced into the bore to extinguish lingering sparks from the previous charge. Sparks and fire are the bane of the artillerist, and our drill is designed to minimize the risk of a “premature ignition” which could cause an “energetic disassembly” of the cannon and its crew.

17.  “If that’s called a Grasshopper, how come it doesn’t hop when you fire it?” 

Answer: See question 3.  Without the resistance of a projectile, the force of the rapidly expanding gases during ignition of the charge exits the barrel without producing a visible “equal and opposite” reaction of a recoil. When you watch our drill, the crew is careful to stay outside the wheels as much as possible, so that a recoiling gun doesn’t cause injury.

18.  “How much gunpowder are you using?”

Answer: Enough to make noise. The propellant is properly called “black powder” and is a mixture of potassium nitrate (nitre), sulfur and charcoal, just like in 1781. The 3 pounder used charges ranging from four to eight ounces, packaged in a linen bag, to which the ball was strapped with a wooden disc called a sabot. We use aluminum foil instead of linen, and find that four ounces of powder is plenty loud for the purpose of a demonstration.

19.  “Are you using a fuse?”

Answer: We are using a “quill” placed in the vent hole on top of the cannon, which communicates with the tube’s interior. Hollow goose feather quills, or its modern equivalent of a soda straw filled with black powder, do good service, and offer more rapid ignition than a fuse, important when the target is moving. For demonstration purposes, we use a paper quill, ignited by a smoldering “slow match” held in the “linstock.” During the War, waterproof tin tubes filled with powder were preferentially used over quills, lit by a flare-like device called a portfire, which was lit by the linstock.

20.  “Did they use these cannons at Gettysburg?”

Answer: I believe that you are confusing two different conflicts. Small cannons such as this Grasshopper were obsolete by the end of the Revolution, relegated to British provincial outposts. It is uncertain whether the two original three pounders used at the Cowpens still exist, although they are known to have changed hands several times during the war. They may have suffered an ignominious demise by being melted for scrap, an unworthy end for weapons whose crews died defending them.

Twistification thanks Dr Rucker!

I want to thank Chris for taking the time to put together responses to questions he and his crew often receive. You can follow up with him at: christopherrucker@msn.com

Check out the demonstrations below. I apologize for the shaky video (but consider yourself fortunate I did not drop my phone all together after a cannon fires).

Next year I’m bringing a tripod.

233rd Battle of Cowpens Anniversary This Weekend!

13 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens

≈ Leave a comment

This will make it my third year in a row for Battle of Cowpens Anniversary Celebration. In honor of the event that helped inspire the creation of this blog, I’ve posted a few of my favorite media from anniversaries past…

Lets start with Burt Puckett’s wonderful summary of the battle:

Here is a link to some photos and videos I took during the 231st Anniversary

Fire!

Fire!

Cowpens 231st Anniversary Celebration

This year I would like to get a good clip of one of the battlefield tours by one of the park rangers. Any other suggestions?

If you plan on being there, please drop me a line in the comments and maybe we can chat some on Saturday.

Was Gettysburg the South’s Waterloo?

15 Sunday Dec 2013

Posted by Twistification in Daniel Morgan, Gettysburg, Napoleon Bonaparte, Revolutionary War, Strategy & Tactics, Waterloo

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Benedict Arnold

Allen Guelzo’s sermon style talk on Gettysburg and its meaning is both thorough and entertaining. Guelzo convincingly argues that had Robert E. Lee won the battle, the South would of marched into Washington and forced peace negotiations and Southern independence. Yet, Guelzo argues that the South’s defeat at Gettysburg was in essence it’s “Waterloo moment”.

General Meade

General Meade

Victory at Gettysburg came despite the leadership of the timid and unremarkable General Meade. How did he accomplish the most famous victory of the war against a superior Robert E. Lee? The answer is that he had a group of tenacious subordinate Generals who pulled him away from his overcautious McClellan like tendencies. It was these unsung generals who uncompromisingly pushed forward to defeat Lee and save the Union.

Yet Guelzo’s analogy to Waterloo falls a little flat. He ends the talk with the comment “Waterloo? What’s Waterloo?”.

Well, it wasn’t Gettysburg thats for sure.

For one thing, had Napoleon won Waterloo, he would not of been able to force peace like Lee hoped to accomplish. Waterloo was the first in what would of been a series of desperate battles to retain Napoleon’s power. Unlike Lee, had Napoleon won the battle, he still had a million mustered soldiers to face. The Prussians and the Russians were coming, and there would be no singular smashing victory that would sway popular opinion and force peace. Napoleon did not have the luxury of fighting against a democracy in Europe.

Horatio GatesIf I were to humbly suggest a comparison to Gettysburg from an earlier historical battle, I would suggest Saratoga.

Like Meade, Horatio Gates managed to pull off a victory despite his caution and passivity. And it was Gates’ subordinate Generals that would ultimately gain the credit for victory. Benedict Arnold and Daniel Morgan’s dogged determination (with the help of the American Rifle) guided the Americans to victory.

The political and military consequences of Saratoga and Gettysburg were also similar. In both cases the enemy’s back had been broken.

In the case of the South, they would never mount an offensive campaign in the North again. The window to influence political opinion before the election had closed. Those in the North clamoring for peace and conciliation would take a back seat to the war hawks like Lincoln who demanded unconditional surrender.

For the British, the loss at Saratoga turned a small regional rebellion into a world war. The victory convinced France to formally ally with the Americans and declare open war with the British Empire. Not only did the loss eliminate a large British contingent in America, it also further diluted British resources in the region as they stretched their military across the globe to defend against the new French threat. At this point, the war in America almost became a second thought. Britain would never again be able to fully focus its military might against America.

In conclusion, i content Gettysburg’s significance had more in common with Saratoga than Waterloo. What was at stake was a military and political killing blow, not a last ditch defensive effort gone wrong. Where Guelzo suggests Lee and Napoleon on the losing end, I humbly counter with Meade and Gates on the victorious end.

Would love to hear others thoughts on this!

Luck and Leadership

22 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Twistification in Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens

≈ Leave a comment

“That’s all very well,” he said, “but is he lucky?”
-Napoleon, when considering the virtues of a new General
 
“Diligence is the mother of good luck”
-Benjamin Franklin
 

Luck is a fickle creature. At the blink of an eye, it can apply itself to a battle by choosing sides and tipping the scales. A general’s ability to recognize this critical moment reflects his competency. Knowing what to do when luck takes a side during a battle is the trait of a master.

daniel morganDaniel Morgan faced this critical situation as he surveyed the confusion and imminent collapse of his right flank during the battle of Cowpens.

Luck seemingly turned to favor to the British as Banastre Tarleton’s elite unit of 71st (Highland) Regiment of Foot moved to envelope the American right flank.

Attempting to counter the British maneuver, the American Captain Andrew Wallace ordered his Virginian Company to wheel about and face the enveloping enemy. As the order was given, a volley of musket fire from the 71st cast a net of noise and confusion over the American line. In the turmoil, Wallace’s Virginia company misunderstood the order and began to fall back. The adjoining American unit commanded by Captain Lawson witnessed the withdraw and followed suit.

Fortunately for the Americans, training and leadership can create a strong buffer against adversity.

Witnessing the confusion, Daniel Morgan rode up to Colonel Howard, who was in command of the troops stationed to the American right.

Morgan: “Have they whipped you?”

Howard: “Do men marching like this look as if they’re beaten?”

Morgan analyzed his situation. His ‘retreating’ men were withdrawing in good order without signs of panic (this can be attributed to Von Steuben’s training). Realizing his men were not broken, Morgan commanded Howard to select a spot on the field for the withdrawing Virginians to hold their ground.

battleofbushyrunchargeofthehighlandersgz6Meanwhile, the 71st did not intend to let their apparent advantage slip away. As they watched the American right seemingly dissolve, they came to believe the decisive blow had been struck. The Highlanders broke formation and charged with bayonets and broad swords at the ready.

But the Highlanders suffered from two unfortunate conditions–exhaustion and overconfidence.

Banastre Tarelton’s troops had marched almost non stop for three days. Exhaustion, combined with an inflated sense of their own potency, tainted the Highlanders perception of the battlefield. They had become accustomed to seeing Americans withdraw over and over again and they had no reason to expect any deviation from this seemingly routine pattern of behavior.

But these Americans had not been beaten. They were not retreating, and even more importantly, they were reloading.

The Highlanders “came on like a mob”. As they closed, the Virginians reached Howard’s designated position on the field. The Americans suddenly stopped, wheeled about, and fired almost point blank into the disorganized ranks of the 71st. It was an 18th century sucker punch. The Highlanders dropped–some from musket fire and others from shock.

cowpens-troop-movements

Design by Twistification. Troop location and movement by Lawrence E. Babits.

Almost simultaneously, William Washington’s cavalry arrived. The surprising appearance of the American cavalry multiplied the shock and surprise. The Americans infantry took advantage of the situation and charged. A brutal melee ensued and the proud 71st Highlanders broke and eventually surrendered.

At this point, the battle of Cowpens was all but over. The British, having suffered devastating blows to both their infantry and cavalry, began to melt away.

The training and courage of American soldiers coupled with a decisive correctional action by Daniel Morgan turned bad luck into an unintended, yet innovative battlefield counterattack against the British.

cowpensFor an extensive and excellent read on the subject, I recommend Lawrence E. Babits, A Devil of a Whipping, the Battle of Cowpens. 

The Battle of Cowpens

06 Sunday Jan 2013

Posted by Twistification in Daniel Morgan, Revolutionary War, Strategy & Tactics, The battle of Cowpens, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 2 Comments

small_the-battle-of-cowpens-sc-1781As the 232nd anniversary of the battle of Cowpens approaches, I picked up a copy of A Devil of a Whipping, the Battle of Cowpens. It was an easy read with some interesting info. Here are a few points:

  • During the Revolution, muskets were called firelocks because they generated their own fire, hence the later term firearm.
  • Both sides increased musket lethality, if not accuracy, by issuing buck and ball cartridges containing one large ball and at least three smaller (.30 caliber) balls.
  • By 1871 both sides deployed rapidly, (abandoning the slow, steady approach march) by closing the distance as quickly as possible, often with sizable gaps between men. This change in tactics was a response to American rifle fire and British artillery.
  • British artillerist John Muller recommended ricochet firing because it saved powder and was more dangerous. After the first ricochet, a ball might bounce another 400 yards and still injure men waiting in reserve.
  • American General Daniel Morgan issued a password and countersign ‘Who are you?’ Answer ‘Fire.’ Reply, ‘Sword.’ Similarly, D-Day’s password and countersign was ‘Flash.’ Reply, ‘Thunder.’
  • Sentries on horseback were called ‘videttes’

Next week I’ll post some tidbits about the battle itself. After that I’ll post photos and video from the anniversary celebration. I hope to make a few contacts that would be willing to guest post.

 

Recent Posts

  • Militia Cavalry
  • Road to Guilford Courthouse
  • With Musket & Tomahawk
  • Long time no post, but updates coming
  • Hunting Frock

Categories

  • 1777 Charleville
  • 4th of July
  • Alexander Hamilton
  • AMC
  • Banastre Tarleton
  • Black Powder
  • Black Powder Firearms
  • Bunker Hill
  • Cavalry
  • Charles Lee
  • Charleston
  • Columbus
  • Cornwallis
  • Cowpens
  • Daniel Morgan
  • documentary
  • Duel
  • Founding Fathers
  • Gear
  • George Washington
  • Gerstner
  • Gettysburg
  • Gun Room
  • Infantry
  • King George III
  • Memorial Day
  • Musket
  • Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Nathaniel Greene
  • National Infantry Museum
  • Reboubt
  • reenactment
  • Revolutionary War
  • Rochambeau
  • Slavery
  • Spontoon
  • Stephen Decatur
  • Strategy & Tactics
  • The battle of Cowpens
  • The Battle of the Hook
  • Thomas Paine
  • TURN
  • Uncategorized
  • War of 1812
  • Waterloo
  • Weapons of the Revolution
  • Whiskey Rebellion
  • Yorktown

Blogs I Follow

  • Get The Picture
  • Laura Lee Living
  • TURN to a historian
  • john pavlovitz
  • Swungover*
  • wbahr
  • 43andfatfree Blog
  • this is... The Neighborhood
  • Twistification
  • That's What She Said
  • Past in the Present
  • TrappersWildWest
  • A Woodsrunner's Diary
  • The Long Roll
  • Journal of the American Revolution

Recent Comments

Fawn Gero on ‘The Revenant’ is…
IAC on Cartridge Making Day!
wbahr on Cartridge Making Day!
Immortan joe on Myths of the Revolution: …
Twistification on Questions for an Artiller…

Recent Comments

Fawn Gero on ‘The Revenant’ is…
IAC on Cartridge Making Day!
wbahr on Cartridge Making Day!
Immortan joe on Myths of the Revolution: …
Twistification on Questions for an Artiller…

Blog at WordPress.com.

Get The Picture

Bloviation for the Dawgnation

Laura Lee Living

Experiences in Life & Kitchen

TURN to a historian

Has "TURN: Washington's Spies" left you feeling a little... spy-curious?

john pavlovitz

Stuff That Needs To Be Said

Swungover*

wbahr

4 out of 5 dentists are pulling for me!

43andfatfree Blog

in 2002 I decided to share my weight loss journey! Its been a life struggle. I hope this site helps others who deal with emotional eating!

this is... The Neighborhood

the Story within the Story

Twistification

All Things Revolutionary War

That's What She Said

Clearly, I take myself seriously.

Past in the Present

Blogging American History--News, Books, Museums, Sites, and More

TrappersWildWest

Historian. Artist. Gunmaker.

A Woodsrunner's Diary

All Things Revolutionary War

The Long Roll

Discussions about the American Civil War (1861-1865)

Journal of the American Revolution

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Twistification
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Twistification
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...