• Home
  • About
  • Books
  • The Battle of Cowpens
    • Cavalry
    • Artillery
    • Infantry
  • Musketry
  • Napoleon vs. Washington
    • Introduction
    • Historical Context
    • Tactics
    • Strategy: Napoleon
    • Strategy: Washington
    • Leadership

Twistification

~ All Things Revolutionary War

Twistification

Category Archives: Cowpens

Almost a Miracle

09 Saturday Aug 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cornwallis, Cowpens, George Washington, Rochambeau

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

John Ferling, marquis de lafayette

Almost a Miracle by John Ferling

Almost a Miracle by John Ferling

Compelling storytelling is a craft not easily mastered by many Historians. We’ve all struggled through books that do nothing more than lead us through a dusty timeline of historical events littered with stale flat historical figures. Worse yet is the historian with a knack for unnecessary detail and little interest in exploring the complexities of human motivation.

So it is with great pleasure then that one comes across a book that covers such a monumental topic such as the American Revolution with a flair for good storytelling. John Ferling’s Almost a Miracle is just that book. The one volume synopsis of the war would be my first suggestion for someone with a casual interest in the American Revolution.

Now time for a few observations of Ferling’s fine work:

Ferling is not a big fan of Lafayette.

Marquis de La Fayette

Marquis de La Fayette

Using words like “petulant”, “brash” and “sycophant”,  Ferling pulls no punches when describing young Marques as an opportunist who rides the coattails of Washington. Ferling notes Rochambeau’s concerns about Lafayette’s attachment to Washington and even points a finger at Lafayette for triggering the events at the battle of Monmouth that effectively ended Charles Lee’s tenure as a general in the Continental army.

Lafayette had a romanticized interpretation of the ideals that drove the Revolution, yet his motivations were complex. He also was driven by an ambition for fame and glory and this ambition was certainly a factor in his decision making.

After the war, Lafayette never wavered from this romantic notion of the Revolution and worked to bring this vision to France. Unfortunately, he was swept up in the chaos of the French Revolution and was fortunate enough to escape with his life.

Not afraid to sidestep historical doubts in order to tell a compelling story.

When dealing with history, very little can be said with absolute certainty. Debate still continues on two instances that Ferling address in Almost a Miracle.

Missed Opportunity?

Missed Opportunity?

One is Patrick Ferguson’s choice not to fire on Washington during the battle Brandywine. Many believe Ferguson spared Washington’s life that day, yet others maintain that this was not Washington at all, but one of the many European Aristocrats participating in the war (Count Casimir Pulaski).

Another is the supposed clash between William Washington and Banastre Tarleton during the battle of Cowpens. Did they briefly engage during the end of the battle? Perhaps, but there are still doubters this confrontation actually took place.

But trifling over the fog of history can bog down an otherwise compelling story, so I applaud Ferling’s choice to avoid the debates and ambiguities that all historians must wrestle with.

Ferling does not ignore the south

Nathaniel Greene

Nathaniel Greene

Ferling points out the essential and often overlooked British southern campaign. To most, Cornwallis magically appears in Yorktown. But Ferling leads us through the series of events in the south that placed him there. Kings Mountain, Cowpens and Guilford Courthouse and the cunning Nathaniel Greene are not overlooked.

Ferling is fair to Hortio Gates and Charles Lee

Disparaged by most historians and laymen alike, Lee and Gates are often exemplars of poor generalship. Ferling does not sugarcoat their shortcomings, however he also describes them as the two most experienced and talented generals under Washington. One is left to feel a twinge of regret that Lee and Gates personal shortcomings led them to infamy.

Ferling’s take on Washington was well thought out and concise.

Was Washington a brilliant General? No. About average according to Ferling. But Ferling points out the attributes that Washington did bring to the table and notes how these were unique and essential to the position. Washington’s ability to work with congress, collaborate with the French, focus on thousands of administrative details and adapt to the circumstances made him the “indispensable man”.


 

John Ferling

John Ferling

In summary, John Ferling’s Almost A Miracle accomplishes the difficult feat of consolidating a long complex period of American history in a very palatable and entertaining way. This book is certainly one to recommend for all those interested in the American Revolution. Well done!

 

Cowpens Countdown

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

18th Century Artillery

Three days until Cowpens!

Here are a few more tidbits from previous Cowpens posts.

Here are a few common questions Chris gets during the reenactment…

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at teh January 1781 battle.
christopherrucker@msn.com

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at the January 1781 battle.  Here he provides some of the common queries his crew receives at the battle’s annual anniversary.

Volunteers and spectators can share their favorite questions with Chris at christopherrucker@msn.com

Questions we Frequently Hear:

1. “How far does the cannon shoot?” 

Answer: A battle’s winner is not decided like a spitting contest. The more germane question should be: what is the effective range of the cannon?  This 3 pounder can hit targets which are hundreds of yards more distant than the range of a musket, which is why the artillery rules the battlefield.

2.  “What does the cannon shoot?”

Answer: It is called a 3 pounder because it shoots primarily a solid iron ball weighing three pounds. A 6 pounder shoots a six pound ball, etc. The gun can also shoot canister, which is a tin can containing musket balls; the can disintegrates at the cannon’s mouth, the balls producing an effect akin to a large shotgun. Canister is a very effective antipersonnel round at close ranges.

3.  “Are you shooting cannon balls today?”

Answer:  There are people and vehicles and houses not very far beyond the clump of trees in our front. This is not a video game. We cannot shoot projectiles which would endanger lives and property.

4.  “Did you fight in the war?”

Answer: No, but my friend over there with the sponge-rammer was personal friends with Gen. Lafayette, and you should go over and ask him all about the general’s children.

5.  “How many people will a cannon ball go through before it stops?”

Answer: We have not conducted such research. I suspect that we could not find enough volunteers to arrive at an acceptable answer. Several, surely. Many, possibly. Depends on the range.

6.  “Are you hot (cold) in those costumes?” 

Answer:  Costumes are what you wear on Halloween. We are wearing uniforms. The two cannons here at the Cowpens were British, captured by the Americans, some of whom were regulars, some militia. Therefore, our six crew members are wearing Continental uniforms, British uniforms, and back country civilian garb as examples of what were worn during the battle.

7. “How much does the cannon weigh?” 

Answer:  There is a numeric code on the breech which lists the weight in hundred weights (112 pounds), quarters of a hundred weight, and pounds. The total is 206 pounds for the barrel. We have carried the carriage, without the barrel, with eight men. It weighs much more than the barrel, and soldiers could not have carried it very far, in what was then called “The Irish Method.”

8.  “Does the Park Service pay you?” 

Answer:  The volunteers here have provided their own uniforms, arms, accoutrements, tents, etc. We are here because we love history, and love to teach. We are paid by the satisfaction of questions answered, and curiosity kindled. Your thanks and the appreciation of the Park Service personnel keeps us coming back.

9.  “Did you sleep here in tents last night?” 

Answer: Some of us did. Some came directly from home, and will return home after the battle to a warm featherbed. Just like the militia was wont to do in 1781.

10.  “Why is this cannon yellow, and the other one over there is black?” 

Answer:  This gun is made of bronze, which is an alloy of copper and primarily tin. That other gun is made of iron. Bronze was lighter, so was valued over iron, since it required less horseflesh and manpower to maneuver than an iron gun of the same size.

11.  “Why is this gun called a Grasshopper?” 

Answer:  Soldiers have always invented nicknames for their weapons. We suspect that the gun’s recoil in the tall grass suggested the hopping motion of a grasshopper.

12.  “Is that a real cannon?” 

Answer:  Please come and touch the cannon after we fire, to confirm that it is not a figment of your imagination. If you mean to differentiate between an original or a reproduction, this is one of a pair of repros given to the USA on our Bicentennial by the British. Pretty magnanimous of the Brits, seeing as how we took the originals from them in battle, every one of their cannoneers dying at his post to defend the guns. A point of honor in the artillery is to never surrender the piece.

13.  “What’s a “piece,” anyway?”

Answer:  The entire weapon is called the “piece” or “the gun.”  The barrel is the “tube,” which sits on the wheeled platform called the “carriage.” The piece was drawn by horse, or could be manipulated short distances on the battlefield by men called “mattrosses,” wielding ropes. The advantage of this small Grasshopper is its portability; it could negotiate the trackless back country without being mired in mud which would immobilize larger cannons, and it could be broken down into its components for transport on horseback, if needed.

14.  “If the gun fires a solid ball, how come in the movies the cannon balls blow up when they hit?”

Answer:  Please do not rely on Hollywood for your history lessons. A ball from a relatively long “gun” such as the 3 pounder travels a low trajectory, spending a short time in flight, too brief for a fused, hollow, explosive shell. A shorter mortar, or a howitzer, throws its projectiles at a higher trajectory, which allows enough time for the fuse in their hollow, powder-filled shells to explode the projectile over the target. Contact fuses were not used in the Revolutionary War, so shells didn’t explode on contact.

15.  “Is your sword sharp?”

Answer: My sword is seldom used for battle. The officer gives both a verbal and visual command to the man who fires the cannon. In the din of battle, a spoken command might be missed, so the officer lowers his raised sword as he verbally commands “Fire.”

16.  “Is that water bucket for the horses?” 

Answer: That is a “sponge bucket,” used to dampen the sponge which is introduced into the bore to extinguish lingering sparks from the previous charge. Sparks and fire are the bane of the artillerist, and our drill is designed to minimize the risk of a “premature ignition” which could cause an “energetic disassembly” of the cannon and its crew.

17.  “If that’s called a Grasshopper, how come it doesn’t hop when you fire it?” 

Answer: See question 3.  Without the resistance of a projectile, the force of the rapidly expanding gases during ignition of the charge exits the barrel without producing a visible “equal and opposite” reaction of a recoil. When you watch our drill, the crew is careful to stay outside the wheels as much as possible, so that a recoiling gun doesn’t cause injury.

18.  “How much gunpowder are you using?”

Answer: Enough to make noise. The propellant is properly called “black powder” and is a mixture of potassium nitrate (nitre), sulfur and charcoal, just like in 1781. The 3 pounder used charges ranging from four to eight ounces, packaged in a linen bag, to which the ball was strapped with a wooden disc called a sabot. We use aluminum foil instead of linen, and find that four ounces of powder is plenty loud for the purpose of a demonstration.

19.  “Are you using a fuse?”

Answer: We are using a “quill” placed in the vent hole on top of the cannon, which communicates with the tube’s interior. Hollow goose feather quills, or its modern equivalent of a soda straw filled with black powder, do good service, and offer more rapid ignition than a fuse, important when the target is moving. For demonstration purposes, we use a paper quill, ignited by a smoldering “slow match” held in the “linstock.” During the War, waterproof tin tubes filled with powder were preferentially used over quills, lit by a flare-like device called a portfire, which was lit by the linstock.

20.  “Did they use these cannons at Gettysburg?”

Answer: I believe that you are confusing two different conflicts. Small cannons such as this Grasshopper were obsolete by the end of the Revolution, relegated to British provincial outposts. It is uncertain whether the two original three pounders used at the Cowpens still exist, although they are known to have changed hands several times during the war. They may have suffered an ignominious demise by being melted for scrap, an unworthy end for weapons whose crews died defending them.

Twistification thanks Dr Rucker!

I want to thank Chris for taking the time to put together responses to questions he and his crew often receive. You can follow up with him at: christopherrucker@msn.com

Check out the demonstrations below. I apologize for the shaky video (but consider yourself fortunate I did not drop my phone all together after a cannon fires).

Next year I’m bringing a tripod.

233rd Battle of Cowpens Anniversary This Weekend!

13 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens

≈ Leave a comment

This will make it my third year in a row for Battle of Cowpens Anniversary Celebration. In honor of the event that helped inspire the creation of this blog, I’ve posted a few of my favorite media from anniversaries past…

Lets start with Burt Puckett’s wonderful summary of the battle:

Here is a link to some photos and videos I took during the 231st Anniversary

Fire!

Fire!

Cowpens 231st Anniversary Celebration

This year I would like to get a good clip of one of the battlefield tours by one of the park rangers. Any other suggestions?

If you plan on being there, please drop me a line in the comments and maybe we can chat some on Saturday.

Shout out to Mike Bell at 790 the Zone

27 Wednesday Nov 2013

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

790 The Zone, Cowpens National Battlefield, Mel Gibson, Mike Bell, The Patriot

The Patriot

The Patriot

I have to give credit to sports talk radio guy Mike Bell from 790 The Zone who today mentioned that he almost stopped at the Cowpens National Battlefield to see “where Mel Gibson beat Tarleton”, but it was too far off I-85. Like most Americans, Bell exclaimed, he preferred his national battlefields just off the highway.

Funny stuff right there.

Myths of the Revolution: Rifles

26 Thursday Sep 2013

Posted by Twistification in Cowpens, Infantry, Musket, Spontoon, The battle of Cowpens, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Rifle

Reenactors aim. Real soldiers didn't?

Reenactors aim. Real soldiers didn’t?

Allthingsliberty.com recently posted a compelling article dispelling a myth surrounding British infantry training and tactics. Did British soldiers aim their muskets? (spoiler alert! Yes. Yes they did. They practiced firing them too).

Revolutionary War myths pass down through generations of Americans and stubbornly clung to life despite the lack of historical evidence.  None perhaps more so than myth that Americans won the war by using American long rifles, guerrilla tactics and training derived solely from hunting and wilderness living. These tactics, technologies and acquired skills had an impact to be sure, but they were not the primary factors that led to victory for the Americans.

What part did Rifles play in the American Victory?

The grooved bore of a rifle improved distance and accuracy to be sure, but this advantage was counterbalanced by an increased loading time. During any battle involving firearms, reloading time is essential to combat effectiveness.

Rifleman

Rifleman

Militiaman armed with rifles often found themselves desperately reloading while a disciplined line of bayonet wielding soldiers rapidly approached. The militiaman were forced to make a decision— flee, or face cold sharp steel.

Since the American long rifle was primarily a hunting weapon and not a military one, it was not built to fit a bayonet. This unfortunate reality placed the rifleman at a distinct disadvantage during melee combat. Few militiamen were outfitted with spontoon or other melee weapon that could match a charging infantryman holding what was essentially a long pole.

Added to this disadvantage was the somewhat brittle construction of the rifle, which had a tendency to break apart if its user was forced to wield it as a club.

As the Revolution progressed, rifles took a back seat to formally trained American Continentals and their standard issue French Charleville smoothbore musket or British Brown Bess.

1777 Charleville with bayonette

1777 Charleville with bayonette

Yet like many myths, wipe away the grime and you will find a kernel of truth. The range and accuracy of the American long rifle gave the militiaman the ability to snipe British officers during battles.  It could be argued that this practice of singling out officers (thought to be a war crime by the British) played a significant role in victories at the battles of Saratoga, Kings Mountain and other partisan battles in the South. In battles so closely contested, rifles could quite possibly tilt the scales.

Conclusion

The American Revolution was essentially an 18th century war. Victory during this period depended upon technology and tactics that had gradually evolved over multiple decades of military innovation. This fact cannot be understated as we look back at the war through the lens of our own period of rapid technological, societal and martial change. Rifles did not suddenly appear and tilt the scales toward the Americans.

Throughout the ages, achieving military victory requires taking the field from the enemy. Armies armed almost exclusively with rifles could not hope to hold a field of battle for long against infantry armed with muskets and bayonets. But why hold territory you say? Why not just exclusively use guerrilla tactics?  Part two of ‘Myths of The Revolution’ will cover this topic.

Revolutionary Revelations

02 Tuesday Jul 2013

Posted by Twistification in 1777 Charleville, Alexander Hamilton, Cowpens, Founding Fathers, George Washington, Revolutionary War, The battle of Cowpens, Uncategorized, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

marquis de lafayette

A collection of fun historical tidbits I’ve come across in the last few years…

Marquis de La Fayette

Marquis de La Fayette

Fact 1: Live in a town, city or county named Fayetteville or Lafayette? Chances are your town was named after the French Aristocrat and Revolutionary war hero Marie-Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de La Fayette.  General Lafayette was a close friend of Washington and a Revolutionary War hero that in many ways embodied the ideals of The Revolution.

Fact 2: James Monroe’s wife, Elizabeth Monroe rescued Madame Lafayette from imprisonment during the French Revolution.

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Fact 3: Washington’s famous crossing of the Delaware and the following battle of Trenton included historical figures Captain William Washington (of Cowpens fame), James Monroe (who was wounded during the surprise attack), John Marshall (the subject of Jefferson’s “Twistification” quote that inspired the name of this blog) and finally Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton.

Horses (or men for that matter) don't respond well to having sharp things pointed at them.

Horses (or men for that matter) don’t respond well to having sharp things pointed at them.

Fact 4: The bayonet was the single most frightening and devastating weapon used against the Americans during The Revolution. American rifles and muskets were not equipped with this military accessory. The infusion of smuggled French arms (like the Charleville musket) eventually helped tilt the balance back to American troops.

Luck and Leadership

22 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Twistification in Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens

≈ Leave a comment

“That’s all very well,” he said, “but is he lucky?”
-Napoleon, when considering the virtues of a new General
 
“Diligence is the mother of good luck”
-Benjamin Franklin
 

Luck is a fickle creature. At the blink of an eye, it can apply itself to a battle by choosing sides and tipping the scales. A general’s ability to recognize this critical moment reflects his competency. Knowing what to do when luck takes a side during a battle is the trait of a master.

daniel morganDaniel Morgan faced this critical situation as he surveyed the confusion and imminent collapse of his right flank during the battle of Cowpens.

Luck seemingly turned to favor to the British as Banastre Tarleton’s elite unit of 71st (Highland) Regiment of Foot moved to envelope the American right flank.

Attempting to counter the British maneuver, the American Captain Andrew Wallace ordered his Virginian Company to wheel about and face the enveloping enemy. As the order was given, a volley of musket fire from the 71st cast a net of noise and confusion over the American line. In the turmoil, Wallace’s Virginia company misunderstood the order and began to fall back. The adjoining American unit commanded by Captain Lawson witnessed the withdraw and followed suit.

Fortunately for the Americans, training and leadership can create a strong buffer against adversity.

Witnessing the confusion, Daniel Morgan rode up to Colonel Howard, who was in command of the troops stationed to the American right.

Morgan: “Have they whipped you?”

Howard: “Do men marching like this look as if they’re beaten?”

Morgan analyzed his situation. His ‘retreating’ men were withdrawing in good order without signs of panic (this can be attributed to Von Steuben’s training). Realizing his men were not broken, Morgan commanded Howard to select a spot on the field for the withdrawing Virginians to hold their ground.

battleofbushyrunchargeofthehighlandersgz6Meanwhile, the 71st did not intend to let their apparent advantage slip away. As they watched the American right seemingly dissolve, they came to believe the decisive blow had been struck. The Highlanders broke formation and charged with bayonets and broad swords at the ready.

But the Highlanders suffered from two unfortunate conditions–exhaustion and overconfidence.

Banastre Tarelton’s troops had marched almost non stop for three days. Exhaustion, combined with an inflated sense of their own potency, tainted the Highlanders perception of the battlefield. They had become accustomed to seeing Americans withdraw over and over again and they had no reason to expect any deviation from this seemingly routine pattern of behavior.

But these Americans had not been beaten. They were not retreating, and even more importantly, they were reloading.

The Highlanders “came on like a mob”. As they closed, the Virginians reached Howard’s designated position on the field. The Americans suddenly stopped, wheeled about, and fired almost point blank into the disorganized ranks of the 71st. It was an 18th century sucker punch. The Highlanders dropped–some from musket fire and others from shock.

cowpens-troop-movements

Design by Twistification. Troop location and movement by Lawrence E. Babits.

Almost simultaneously, William Washington’s cavalry arrived. The surprising appearance of the American cavalry multiplied the shock and surprise. The Americans infantry took advantage of the situation and charged. A brutal melee ensued and the proud 71st Highlanders broke and eventually surrendered.

At this point, the battle of Cowpens was all but over. The British, having suffered devastating blows to both their infantry and cavalry, began to melt away.

The training and courage of American soldiers coupled with a decisive correctional action by Daniel Morgan turned bad luck into an unintended, yet innovative battlefield counterattack against the British.

cowpensFor an extensive and excellent read on the subject, I recommend Lawrence E. Babits, A Devil of a Whipping, the Battle of Cowpens. 

Questions for a Infantry Man (Part 1)

18 Monday Feb 2013

Posted by Twistification in Cowpens, Infantry, Strategy & Tactics, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 1 Comment

Guilford 45 (NM)Patrick O’Kelley served 20 years in the military, retiring with the rank of Sergeant First Class. He was with the 82nd Airborne Division – the 3rd Ranger Battalion – F Company, 51st Long Range Surveillance Unit – 5th Special Forces Group and the 3rd Special Forces Group.

A sniper in the 82nd Airborne, O’Kelley served during the invasion of Grenada in 1983 and with the 5th Special Forces Group during Desert Storm in 1991.

Patrick has been reenacting the Revolutionary War since 1979 and has been in the same unit, the 2nd North Carolina Regiment, since that time.

I can’t imagine a more qualified person to answer a few humble questions from a Revolutionary War enthusiast. Thanks to Mr. O’Kelley for taking the time to sit down with Twistification!

What are some of the common troop types fielded by the Americans and British during the Revolution?

I’m assuming you mean what types of units were in the war.  The British army was not the “best army in the world” during the American Revolution, though many like to describe it as such.  However the British army was extremely adaptive and would change tactics, weapons and uniforms to fit the war they were in.  They remind me of the United States Army today.  A typical British Regiment consisted of several Regular Infantry Companies, one Light Infantry Company and one Grenadier Company.

In theory the Lights would move out in front of the main body and act as skirmishers, making the enemy deploy.  The Grenadiers were the “heavies” and were used as the assault force or the anchor.  The Regular companies would do the brunt work of the attack.

However theory went out the window when they fought in America.  British tactics were made for fighting in Europe, with wide open fields where artillery and cavalry could be used to their most effective.  America was not Europe and consisted of one giant forest stretching from Canada to Florida.  Not a lot of open fields and most battles happened on and around roads, since that was the only clear spot on the map. So when the British changed their tactics they basically made everyone Light Infantry.  The formations spread out in “open order” (greater distances between men) and the uniforms were modified for fast movement, such as round hats or shorter jackets.  The Light Infantry companies and the Grenadier companies banded together into Light Infantry and Grenadier brigades.

The American army started out with nothing.  No uniforms, no weapon factories, no navy, and not a lot of ammunition.  In the beginning no two units had the same drill and trying to get soldiers from one region to cooperate with those from another region seemed an impossible task.  Washington had to organize this ugly mob into some sort of a fighting force, all the while begging Congress to give him the basics and trying to appease dozens of officers who thought they should be in charge.

And when these two forces faced off, how did it go? 

In the beginning the American army could not take on the British, so they relied on a defensive strategy.  Bunker Hill worked tactically, so every battle seemed to be a version of that.  When Washington was able to defeat the Hessians at Trenton, he relied on this tactic to beat the British.  However the British are not the Hessians and when Washington tried to do a “Trenton” at Germantown, it cost him.

At Bunker Hill the British learned a deadly lesson.  If the Americans were entrenched, they would put up a vicious fight. The Americans could also shoot.  This was because a large part of the American army on that field had rifles, a weapon that the British were not used to in a military battle.  The rifle was a civilian weapon, but the American army was a civilian army.  The British soon learned that if you could close with the Americans, fast, they could not take on the British soldier armed with a bayonet and usually would retreat or run away in panic.

What saved the American army was von Steuben.  He showed them how to fight like the Prussian army, using columns to move into battle instead of Indian file, and he was able to get all working together on the same drill.  Add to that the influx of French arms and bayonets, and the “new” American army was finally able to take on the British at Monmouth using their own methods.

The American army was honed to their most effective when the war came to the South.  Greene used Morgan’s strategy of a “defense in depth” of not one line, but a series of lines that the British army had to break through.  Each line made the British lose men, ammunition and strength.  It would be like playing a football game with three offensive lines guarding the quarterback and not just one.  Though Greene didn’t trust the militia, he was able to use them to their best potential as a skirmish line to slow down the British before engaging the main line of Continentals.

To be continued…

Twistification thanks Patrick O’Kelley

Patrick is currently a Junior ROTC instructor in Sanford, North Carolina at Lee County High School.  He is the author of the four volume series, “Nothing but Blood and Slaughter, the Revolutionary War in the Carolinas” and “Unwaried Patience and Fortitude, Francis Marion’s Orderly Book”.

Questions for a Cavalry Man

01 Friday Feb 2013

Posted by Twistification in Cavalry, Cowpens, The battle of Cowpens, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 1 Comment

bertBert Puckett Started reenacting with his family in 1976. What started as weekend family outings quickly turned into a life long passion. Bert has portrayed infantry, artillery and cavalry in his life long search for knowledge of American Colonial times and birth of our nation. Bert retired from the Army as a Command Sergeant Major after 25 years. He currently reenacts with the Third Light Dragoons with his son Hunter and his wife Chris.

Bert Puckett Q & A

1. How did American cavalry contribute to the victory at Cowpens?
Dragoons added a much needed punch for the infantry to exploit. In the two charges at Cowpens, the Third Light Dragoons managed first to save the militia that was retreating from being run over by the British 17th Dragoons and eliminating the 17th as a viable fighting force for the rest of the battle. During its second charge the Third charged British forces that were reeling from a deadly volley of musketry and managed to totally surround part of the British force.

2. Approximately how many cavalry (on both sides) participated at the battle?
There was a total of 482 mounted men on the field at Cowpens. (+or- ) 182 American horse composed of the Third Light Dragoons and various mounted militia units from North and South Carolina.

There was about 300 British Dragoons from the 17th Light Dragoons (British) and the British Legion (the British Legion was composed of Loyalist Americans primarily recruited in New York State).

3. What different types of cavalry were employed during the battle?
The cavalry on both sides were know as “Light Dragoons”. Light Dragoons were to be used in scouting and reconnaissance roles. How ever during the Revolutionary war, Light Dragoons were used as heavy cavalry in places like Cowpens, Guilford Court House and Eutaw Springs. Banastre Tarleton was a master of using the lightning speed and the massive punch of mounted men in battle.

4. Tell us a little about William Washington, the American cavalry leader at the battle of Cowpens.
William Washington was the second cousin of His Excellency George Washington. He was born into the Virginia aristocracy and his family owned and farmed a 1200 acre plantation. Being the second son Washington was not the heir to the plantation. Nothing has been found to tell us much of Williams young life. We do know however that as a young man William Washington decided to enter training as an Episcopal minister. However by the turbulent 1770’s Washington was being drawn into the conflict that would define his life. He joined the Virginia Militia soon after the “shot heard ’round the world” at Lexington Green. On Sept 12 1776 he was elected as Captain of the Stafford County Militia. His militia unit was soon designated as the 3rd Virginia Continental Regiment. (Infantry) The 3rd Va was ordered north in the summer of 76 were he participated in the battle of Harlem Heights where he received his baptism of fire. He also participated in the crossing of the Delaware that Christmas.

In January of 1777 the Continental Congress authorized that four regiments of Dragoons were to be raised. William Washington was at that time commissioned as a Major in the Fourth Light Dragoons under Colonel Moylan. It was with this unit that Washington fought with through the entire Philadelphia campaign.

On Sept 28th 1777 The 3rd Light Dragoons were Devastated by a night time raid led by General Charles (no Flint) Grey. The commander of the Third Dragoons, Colonel George Baylor was gravely wounded and captured. General George Washington was shocked at the brutality of the attack and the loss of his friend Colonel Baylor but quickly realized that new commander would be needed too rebuild and train the remains of the Third Dragoons. Being a Virginia based unit, the choice was a natural one: he selected his cousin William Washington.

5. What are weapons commonly wielded by cavalry? What are some techniques for using them?
The American Dragoons being under supplied primarily relied on the saber. Pistols were used primarily for signaling and were extremely inaccurate beyond anymore than a few yards. If used from the back of moving horse the accuracy was negligible. Longer length carbines were rare in the American Dragoons, However, the British made use of them to a degree when dismounted. Using two hands to fire a carbine simply wasn’t practical. But above all the Horse was the primary weapon of the cavalry.

6. What kind of horses did they ride?
Dragoons of the time were mounted on small light horses capable of long distances. Usually these horse were Quarter Pacers or Thoroughbreds rarely over 15 hands in height.

7. Was is the worst fear of the cavalry man?
The worst fear of the mounted soldier was to be caught in camp with his mount unbridled and unsaddled. This happened the the Third Dragoons three times during the war (Tappan Farm, Monck’s Corner and Lenudes Ferry).

8. How did troops commonly defend against cavalry attacks?
Disciplined infantry could defend against a cavalry attack by closing ranks and forming a square with both the front rank presenting their bayonets to the front while the rear rank fired at will. Another well used technique used more often in the war was for the infantry to fall back into very thick woods were mounted men could not follow (Eutaw Springs).

9. What are some common misconceptions about 18th century cavalry?
Unlike the movies, a cavalry charge was not a head long gallop from start to finish. Strict order was essential to achieve the desired speed and shock and therefore charges typically began at a trot and progressed to a canter. A gallop wasn’t called for until fifty yards from the target.

10. What is the strangest question you’ve received during a demonstration?
Do you really sleep in those tents? Is that your horse?

11. In your opinion, who was the greatest cavalry leader/fighter or horseman of the Revolutionary war?
There were many horsemen of the time that were exceptional. But the two that stick out for their aggressive nature would be William Washington for the Americans and Banister Tarleton for the British forces. William Washington learned extremely fast how maneuver his men. Tarleton was super aggressive and was rarely beaten in the field.

Twistification Thanks Bert Puckett

Be sure to visit Bert and his companions at the 233rd anniversary of the battle of Cowpens January 2014.

Also check out Bert’s excellent summary of the Battle of Cowpens.

Also, check out a summary of cavalry equipment and tactics here:

Questions for an Artillerist

23 Wednesday Jan 2013

Posted by Twistification in Cowpens, Revolutionary War, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 7 Comments

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at teh January 1781 battle.

christopherrucker@msn.com

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at the January 1781 battle.  Here he provides some of the common queries his crew receives at the battle’s annual anniversary.

Volunteers and spectators can share their favorite questions with Chris at christopherrucker@msn.com

Questions we Frequently Hear:

1. “How far does the cannon shoot?” 

Answer: A battle’s winner is not decided like a spitting contest. The more germane question should be: what is the effective range of the cannon?  This 3 pounder can hit targets which are hundreds of yards more distant than the range of a musket, which is why the artillery rules the battlefield.

2.  “What does the cannon shoot?”

Answer: It is called a 3 pounder because it shoots primarily a solid iron ball weighing three pounds. A 6 pounder shoots a six pound ball, etc. The gun can also shoot canister, which is a tin can containing musket balls; the can disintegrates at the cannon’s mouth, the balls producing an effect akin to a large shotgun. Canister is a very effective antipersonnel round at close ranges.

3.  “Are you shooting cannon balls today?”

Answer:  There are people and vehicles and houses not very far beyond the clump of trees in our front. This is not a video game. We cannot shoot projectiles which would endanger lives and property.

4.  “Did you fight in the war?”

Answer: No, but my friend over there with the sponge-rammer was personal friends with Gen. Lafayette, and you should go over and ask him all about the general’s children.

5.  “How many people will a cannon ball go through before it stops?”

Answer: We have not conducted such research. I suspect that we could not find enough volunteers to arrive at an acceptable answer. Several, surely. Many, possibly. Depends on the range.

6.  “Are you hot (cold) in those costumes?” 

Answer:  Costumes are what you wear on Halloween. We are wearing uniforms. The two cannons here at the Cowpens were British, captured by the Americans, some of whom were regulars, some militia. Therefore, our six crew members are wearing Continental uniforms, British uniforms, and back country civilian garb as examples of what were worn during the battle.

7. “How much does the cannon weigh?” 

Answer:  There is a numeric code on the breech which lists the weight in hundred weights (112 pounds), quarters of a hundred weight, and pounds. The total is 206 pounds for the barrel. We have carried the carriage, without the barrel, with eight men. It weighs much more than the barrel, and soldiers could not have carried it very far, in what was then called “The Irish Method.”

8.  “Does the Park Service pay you?” 

Answer:  The volunteers here have provided their own uniforms, arms, accoutrements, tents, etc. We are here because we love history, and love to teach. We are paid by the satisfaction of questions answered, and curiosity kindled. Your thanks and the appreciation of the Park Service personnel keeps us coming back.

9.  “Did you sleep here in tents last night?” 

Answer: Some of us did. Some came directly from home, and will return home after the battle to a warm featherbed. Just like the militia was wont to do in 1781.

10.  “Why is this cannon yellow, and the other one over there is black?” 

Answer:  This gun is made of bronze, which is an alloy of copper and primarily tin. That other gun is made of iron. Bronze was lighter, so was valued over iron, since it required less horseflesh and manpower to maneuver than an iron gun of the same size.

11.  “Why is this gun called a Grasshopper?” 

Answer:  Soldiers have always invented nicknames for their weapons. We suspect that the gun’s recoil in the tall grass suggested the hopping motion of a grasshopper.

12.  “Is that a real cannon?” 

Answer:  Please come and touch the cannon after we fire, to confirm that it is not a figment of your imagination. If you mean to differentiate between an original or a reproduction, this is one of a pair of repros given to the USA on our Bicentennial by the British. Pretty magnanimous of the Brits, seeing as how we took the originals from them in battle, every one of their cannoneers dying at his post to defend the guns. A point of honor in the artillery is to never surrender the piece.

13.  “What’s a “piece,” anyway?”

Answer:  The entire weapon is called the “piece” or “the gun.”  The barrel is the “tube,” which sits on the wheeled platform called the “carriage.” The piece was drawn by horse, or could be manipulated short distances on the battlefield by men called “mattrosses,” wielding ropes. The advantage of this small Grasshopper is its portability; it could negotiate the trackless back country without being mired in mud which would immobilize larger cannons, and it could be broken down into its components for transport on horseback, if needed.

14.  “If the gun fires a solid ball, how come in the movies the cannon balls blow up when they hit?”

Answer:  Please do not rely on Hollywood for your history lessons. A ball from a relatively long “gun” such as the 3 pounder travels a low trajectory, spending a short time in flight, too brief for a fused, hollow, explosive shell. A shorter mortar, or a howitzer, throws its projectiles at a higher trajectory, which allows enough time for the fuse in their hollow, powder-filled shells to explode the projectile over the target. Contact fuses were not used in the Revolutionary War, so shells didn’t explode on contact.

15.  “Is your sword sharp?”

Answer: My sword is seldom used for battle. The officer gives both a verbal and visual command to the man who fires the cannon. In the din of battle, a spoken command might be missed, so the officer lowers his raised sword as he verbally commands “Fire.”

16.  “Is that water bucket for the horses?” 

Answer: That is a “sponge bucket,” used to dampen the sponge which is introduced into the bore to extinguish lingering sparks from the previous charge. Sparks and fire are the bane of the artillerist, and our drill is designed to minimize the risk of a “premature ignition” which could cause an “energetic disassembly” of the cannon and its crew.

17.  “If that’s called a Grasshopper, how come it doesn’t hop when you fire it?” 

Answer: See question 3.  Without the resistance of a projectile, the force of the rapidly expanding gases during ignition of the charge exits the barrel without producing a visible “equal and opposite” reaction of a recoil. When you watch our drill, the crew is careful to stay outside the wheels as much as possible, so that a recoiling gun doesn’t cause injury.

18.  “How much gunpowder are you using?”

Answer: Enough to make noise. The propellant is properly called “black powder” and is a mixture of potassium nitrate (nitre), sulfur and charcoal, just like in 1781. The 3 pounder used charges ranging from four to eight ounces, packaged in a linen bag, to which the ball was strapped with a wooden disc called a sabot. We use aluminum foil instead of linen, and find that four ounces of powder is plenty loud for the purpose of a demonstration.

19.  “Are you using a fuse?”

Answer: We are using a “quill” placed in the vent hole on top of the cannon, which communicates with the tube’s interior. Hollow goose feather quills, or its modern equivalent of a soda straw filled with black powder, do good service, and offer more rapid ignition than a fuse, important when the target is moving. For demonstration purposes, we use a paper quill, ignited by a smoldering “slow match” held in the “linstock.” During the War, waterproof tin tubes filled with powder were preferentially used over quills, lit by a flare-like device called a portfire, which was lit by the linstock.

20.  “Did they use these cannons at Gettysburg?”

Answer: I believe that you are confusing two different conflicts. Small cannons such as this Grasshopper were obsolete by the end of the Revolution, relegated to British provincial outposts. It is uncertain whether the two original three pounders used at the Cowpens still exist, although they are known to have changed hands several times during the war. They may have suffered an ignominious demise by being melted for scrap, an unworthy end for weapons whose crews died defending them.

Twistification thanks Dr Rucker!

I want to thank Chris for taking the time to put together responses to questions he and his crew often receive. You can follow up with him at: christopherrucker@msn.com

Check out the demonstrations below. I apologize for the shaky video (but consider yourself fortunate I did not drop my phone all together after a cannon fires).

Next year I’m bringing a tripod.

Recent Posts

  • Militia Cavalry
  • Road to Guilford Courthouse
  • With Musket & Tomahawk
  • Long time no post, but updates coming
  • Hunting Frock

Categories

  • 1777 Charleville
  • 4th of July
  • Alexander Hamilton
  • AMC
  • Banastre Tarleton
  • Black Powder
  • Black Powder Firearms
  • Bunker Hill
  • Cavalry
  • Charles Lee
  • Charleston
  • Columbus
  • Cornwallis
  • Cowpens
  • Daniel Morgan
  • documentary
  • Duel
  • Founding Fathers
  • Gear
  • George Washington
  • Gerstner
  • Gettysburg
  • Gun Room
  • Infantry
  • King George III
  • Memorial Day
  • Musket
  • Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Nathaniel Greene
  • National Infantry Museum
  • Reboubt
  • reenactment
  • Revolutionary War
  • Rochambeau
  • Slavery
  • Spontoon
  • Stephen Decatur
  • Strategy & Tactics
  • The battle of Cowpens
  • The Battle of the Hook
  • Thomas Paine
  • TURN
  • Uncategorized
  • War of 1812
  • Waterloo
  • Weapons of the Revolution
  • Whiskey Rebellion
  • Yorktown

Blogs I Follow

  • Get The Picture
  • Laura Lee Living
  • TURN to a historian
  • john pavlovitz
  • Swungover*
  • wbahr
  • 43andfatfree Blog
  • this is... The Neighborhood
  • Twistification
  • That's What She Said
  • Past in the Present
  • TrappersWildWest
  • A Woodsrunner's Diary
  • The Long Roll
  • Journal of the American Revolution

Recent Comments

Fawn Gero on ‘The Revenant’ is…
IAC on Cartridge Making Day!
wbahr on Cartridge Making Day!
Immortan joe on Myths of the Revolution: …
Twistification on Questions for an Artiller…

Recent Comments

Fawn Gero on ‘The Revenant’ is…
IAC on Cartridge Making Day!
wbahr on Cartridge Making Day!
Immortan joe on Myths of the Revolution: …
Twistification on Questions for an Artiller…

Blog at WordPress.com.

Get The Picture

Bloviation for the Dawgnation

Laura Lee Living

Experiences in Life & Kitchen

TURN to a historian

Has "TURN: Washington's Spies" left you feeling a little... spy-curious?

john pavlovitz

Stuff That Needs To Be Said

Swungover*

wbahr

4 out of 5 dentists are pulling for me!

43andfatfree Blog

in 2002 I decided to share my weight loss journey! Its been a life struggle. I hope this site helps others who deal with emotional eating!

this is... The Neighborhood

the Story within the Story

Twistification

All Things Revolutionary War

That's What She Said

Clearly, I take myself seriously.

Past in the Present

Blogging American History--News, Books, Museums, Sites, and More

TrappersWildWest

Historian. Artist. Gunmaker.

A Woodsrunner's Diary

All Things Revolutionary War

The Long Roll

Discussions about the American Civil War (1861-1865)

Journal of the American Revolution

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Twistification
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Twistification
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...