• Home
  • About
  • Books
  • The Battle of Cowpens
    • Cavalry
    • Artillery
    • Infantry
  • Musketry
  • Napoleon vs. Washington
    • Introduction
    • Historical Context
    • Tactics
    • Strategy: Napoleon
    • Strategy: Washington
    • Leadership

Twistification

~ All Things Revolutionary War

Twistification

Category Archives: Banastre Tarleton

Almost a Miracle

09 Saturday Aug 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cornwallis, Cowpens, George Washington, Rochambeau

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

John Ferling, marquis de lafayette

Almost a Miracle by John Ferling

Almost a Miracle by John Ferling

Compelling storytelling is a craft not easily mastered by many Historians. We’ve all struggled through books that do nothing more than lead us through a dusty timeline of historical events littered with stale flat historical figures. Worse yet is the historian with a knack for unnecessary detail and little interest in exploring the complexities of human motivation.

So it is with great pleasure then that one comes across a book that covers such a monumental topic such as the American Revolution with a flair for good storytelling. John Ferling’s Almost a Miracle is just that book. The one volume synopsis of the war would be my first suggestion for someone with a casual interest in the American Revolution.

Now time for a few observations of Ferling’s fine work:

Ferling is not a big fan of Lafayette.

Marquis de La Fayette

Marquis de La Fayette

Using words like “petulant”, “brash” and “sycophant”,  Ferling pulls no punches when describing young Marques as an opportunist who rides the coattails of Washington. Ferling notes Rochambeau’s concerns about Lafayette’s attachment to Washington and even points a finger at Lafayette for triggering the events at the battle of Monmouth that effectively ended Charles Lee’s tenure as a general in the Continental army.

Lafayette had a romanticized interpretation of the ideals that drove the Revolution, yet his motivations were complex. He also was driven by an ambition for fame and glory and this ambition was certainly a factor in his decision making.

After the war, Lafayette never wavered from this romantic notion of the Revolution and worked to bring this vision to France. Unfortunately, he was swept up in the chaos of the French Revolution and was fortunate enough to escape with his life.

Not afraid to sidestep historical doubts in order to tell a compelling story.

When dealing with history, very little can be said with absolute certainty. Debate still continues on two instances that Ferling address in Almost a Miracle.

Missed Opportunity?

Missed Opportunity?

One is Patrick Ferguson’s choice not to fire on Washington during the battle Brandywine. Many believe Ferguson spared Washington’s life that day, yet others maintain that this was not Washington at all, but one of the many European Aristocrats participating in the war (Count Casimir Pulaski).

Another is the supposed clash between William Washington and Banastre Tarleton during the battle of Cowpens. Did they briefly engage during the end of the battle? Perhaps, but there are still doubters this confrontation actually took place.

But trifling over the fog of history can bog down an otherwise compelling story, so I applaud Ferling’s choice to avoid the debates and ambiguities that all historians must wrestle with.

Ferling does not ignore the south

Nathaniel Greene

Nathaniel Greene

Ferling points out the essential and often overlooked British southern campaign. To most, Cornwallis magically appears in Yorktown. But Ferling leads us through the series of events in the south that placed him there. Kings Mountain, Cowpens and Guilford Courthouse and the cunning Nathaniel Greene are not overlooked.

Ferling is fair to Hortio Gates and Charles Lee

Disparaged by most historians and laymen alike, Lee and Gates are often exemplars of poor generalship. Ferling does not sugarcoat their shortcomings, however he also describes them as the two most experienced and talented generals under Washington. One is left to feel a twinge of regret that Lee and Gates personal shortcomings led them to infamy.

Ferling’s take on Washington was well thought out and concise.

Was Washington a brilliant General? No. About average according to Ferling. But Ferling points out the attributes that Washington did bring to the table and notes how these were unique and essential to the position. Washington’s ability to work with congress, collaborate with the French, focus on thousands of administrative details and adapt to the circumstances made him the “indispensable man”.


 

John Ferling

John Ferling

In summary, John Ferling’s Almost A Miracle accomplishes the difficult feat of consolidating a long complex period of American history in a very palatable and entertaining way. This book is certainly one to recommend for all those interested in the American Revolution. Well done!

 

Cowpens Countdown

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

18th Century Artillery

Three days until Cowpens!

Here are a few more tidbits from previous Cowpens posts.

Here are a few common questions Chris gets during the reenactment…

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at teh January 1781 battle.
christopherrucker@msn.com

Christopher Rucker, MD, is an artillerist at the Cowpens National Battlefield, where his volunteer crew interprets the use of the two British cannon used at the January 1781 battle.  Here he provides some of the common queries his crew receives at the battle’s annual anniversary.

Volunteers and spectators can share their favorite questions with Chris at christopherrucker@msn.com

Questions we Frequently Hear:

1. “How far does the cannon shoot?” 

Answer: A battle’s winner is not decided like a spitting contest. The more germane question should be: what is the effective range of the cannon?  This 3 pounder can hit targets which are hundreds of yards more distant than the range of a musket, which is why the artillery rules the battlefield.

2.  “What does the cannon shoot?”

Answer: It is called a 3 pounder because it shoots primarily a solid iron ball weighing three pounds. A 6 pounder shoots a six pound ball, etc. The gun can also shoot canister, which is a tin can containing musket balls; the can disintegrates at the cannon’s mouth, the balls producing an effect akin to a large shotgun. Canister is a very effective antipersonnel round at close ranges.

3.  “Are you shooting cannon balls today?”

Answer:  There are people and vehicles and houses not very far beyond the clump of trees in our front. This is not a video game. We cannot shoot projectiles which would endanger lives and property.

4.  “Did you fight in the war?”

Answer: No, but my friend over there with the sponge-rammer was personal friends with Gen. Lafayette, and you should go over and ask him all about the general’s children.

5.  “How many people will a cannon ball go through before it stops?”

Answer: We have not conducted such research. I suspect that we could not find enough volunteers to arrive at an acceptable answer. Several, surely. Many, possibly. Depends on the range.

6.  “Are you hot (cold) in those costumes?” 

Answer:  Costumes are what you wear on Halloween. We are wearing uniforms. The two cannons here at the Cowpens were British, captured by the Americans, some of whom were regulars, some militia. Therefore, our six crew members are wearing Continental uniforms, British uniforms, and back country civilian garb as examples of what were worn during the battle.

7. “How much does the cannon weigh?” 

Answer:  There is a numeric code on the breech which lists the weight in hundred weights (112 pounds), quarters of a hundred weight, and pounds. The total is 206 pounds for the barrel. We have carried the carriage, without the barrel, with eight men. It weighs much more than the barrel, and soldiers could not have carried it very far, in what was then called “The Irish Method.”

8.  “Does the Park Service pay you?” 

Answer:  The volunteers here have provided their own uniforms, arms, accoutrements, tents, etc. We are here because we love history, and love to teach. We are paid by the satisfaction of questions answered, and curiosity kindled. Your thanks and the appreciation of the Park Service personnel keeps us coming back.

9.  “Did you sleep here in tents last night?” 

Answer: Some of us did. Some came directly from home, and will return home after the battle to a warm featherbed. Just like the militia was wont to do in 1781.

10.  “Why is this cannon yellow, and the other one over there is black?” 

Answer:  This gun is made of bronze, which is an alloy of copper and primarily tin. That other gun is made of iron. Bronze was lighter, so was valued over iron, since it required less horseflesh and manpower to maneuver than an iron gun of the same size.

11.  “Why is this gun called a Grasshopper?” 

Answer:  Soldiers have always invented nicknames for their weapons. We suspect that the gun’s recoil in the tall grass suggested the hopping motion of a grasshopper.

12.  “Is that a real cannon?” 

Answer:  Please come and touch the cannon after we fire, to confirm that it is not a figment of your imagination. If you mean to differentiate between an original or a reproduction, this is one of a pair of repros given to the USA on our Bicentennial by the British. Pretty magnanimous of the Brits, seeing as how we took the originals from them in battle, every one of their cannoneers dying at his post to defend the guns. A point of honor in the artillery is to never surrender the piece.

13.  “What’s a “piece,” anyway?”

Answer:  The entire weapon is called the “piece” or “the gun.”  The barrel is the “tube,” which sits on the wheeled platform called the “carriage.” The piece was drawn by horse, or could be manipulated short distances on the battlefield by men called “mattrosses,” wielding ropes. The advantage of this small Grasshopper is its portability; it could negotiate the trackless back country without being mired in mud which would immobilize larger cannons, and it could be broken down into its components for transport on horseback, if needed.

14.  “If the gun fires a solid ball, how come in the movies the cannon balls blow up when they hit?”

Answer:  Please do not rely on Hollywood for your history lessons. A ball from a relatively long “gun” such as the 3 pounder travels a low trajectory, spending a short time in flight, too brief for a fused, hollow, explosive shell. A shorter mortar, or a howitzer, throws its projectiles at a higher trajectory, which allows enough time for the fuse in their hollow, powder-filled shells to explode the projectile over the target. Contact fuses were not used in the Revolutionary War, so shells didn’t explode on contact.

15.  “Is your sword sharp?”

Answer: My sword is seldom used for battle. The officer gives both a verbal and visual command to the man who fires the cannon. In the din of battle, a spoken command might be missed, so the officer lowers his raised sword as he verbally commands “Fire.”

16.  “Is that water bucket for the horses?” 

Answer: That is a “sponge bucket,” used to dampen the sponge which is introduced into the bore to extinguish lingering sparks from the previous charge. Sparks and fire are the bane of the artillerist, and our drill is designed to minimize the risk of a “premature ignition” which could cause an “energetic disassembly” of the cannon and its crew.

17.  “If that’s called a Grasshopper, how come it doesn’t hop when you fire it?” 

Answer: See question 3.  Without the resistance of a projectile, the force of the rapidly expanding gases during ignition of the charge exits the barrel without producing a visible “equal and opposite” reaction of a recoil. When you watch our drill, the crew is careful to stay outside the wheels as much as possible, so that a recoiling gun doesn’t cause injury.

18.  “How much gunpowder are you using?”

Answer: Enough to make noise. The propellant is properly called “black powder” and is a mixture of potassium nitrate (nitre), sulfur and charcoal, just like in 1781. The 3 pounder used charges ranging from four to eight ounces, packaged in a linen bag, to which the ball was strapped with a wooden disc called a sabot. We use aluminum foil instead of linen, and find that four ounces of powder is plenty loud for the purpose of a demonstration.

19.  “Are you using a fuse?”

Answer: We are using a “quill” placed in the vent hole on top of the cannon, which communicates with the tube’s interior. Hollow goose feather quills, or its modern equivalent of a soda straw filled with black powder, do good service, and offer more rapid ignition than a fuse, important when the target is moving. For demonstration purposes, we use a paper quill, ignited by a smoldering “slow match” held in the “linstock.” During the War, waterproof tin tubes filled with powder were preferentially used over quills, lit by a flare-like device called a portfire, which was lit by the linstock.

20.  “Did they use these cannons at Gettysburg?”

Answer: I believe that you are confusing two different conflicts. Small cannons such as this Grasshopper were obsolete by the end of the Revolution, relegated to British provincial outposts. It is uncertain whether the two original three pounders used at the Cowpens still exist, although they are known to have changed hands several times during the war. They may have suffered an ignominious demise by being melted for scrap, an unworthy end for weapons whose crews died defending them.

Twistification thanks Dr Rucker!

I want to thank Chris for taking the time to put together responses to questions he and his crew often receive. You can follow up with him at: christopherrucker@msn.com

Check out the demonstrations below. I apologize for the shaky video (but consider yourself fortunate I did not drop my phone all together after a cannon fires).

Next year I’m bringing a tripod.

233rd Battle of Cowpens Anniversary This Weekend!

13 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens, Daniel Morgan, The battle of Cowpens

≈ Leave a comment

This will make it my third year in a row for Battle of Cowpens Anniversary Celebration. In honor of the event that helped inspire the creation of this blog, I’ve posted a few of my favorite media from anniversaries past…

Lets start with Burt Puckett’s wonderful summary of the battle:

Here is a link to some photos and videos I took during the 231st Anniversary

Fire!

Fire!

Cowpens 231st Anniversary Celebration

This year I would like to get a good clip of one of the battlefield tours by one of the park rangers. Any other suggestions?

If you plan on being there, please drop me a line in the comments and maybe we can chat some on Saturday.

Top Ten Tips for Holding A Empire Together

03 Friday Jan 2014

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Founding Fathers, George Washington, King George III, Revolutionary War

≈ 1 Comment

King George III

King George III

Ok may be a few years overdue, but here are Twistification’s tips for His Royal Majesty King George the Third:

  1. If people from your country risk life and limb to travel over a thousand treacherous miles to practice their religion without persecution, expect some skepticism regarding your policies from their offspring.
  2. Taxes can work, but you may want to consider administrating them locally and gathering feedback.
  3.  The Continental Congress wants to negotiate. Don’t force their hand and give them no other choice but to declare war.
  4. Mr. Washington, Mr. Franklin and Mr. Jefferson deserve some military and administrative recognition. They have more influence and talents than you realize (Mr. Adams and his cousin are a lost cause however). That didn’t work? Ok now that the war has begun:
  5. Push your Generals to take advantage of early victories. The rebellion can be crushed early, but if you give the Americans time to recover, things will escalate out of control. And whatever you do, don’t let them gain any moral victories. 
  6. Banastre Tarleton

    Banastre Tarleton

    Make sure your Generals coordinate strategically. Divas will not help your cause in the new world.

  7. Don’t lose a big battle. I repeat DON’T LOSE A BIG BATTLE. Your neighbors across the channel are looking for an excuse to join the fight and turn this regional uprising into a worldwide conflict.
  8. Patrick Ferguson and his modified rifle might be a good investment considering the amount of American rifles mustered against your army.
  9. The South isn’t as Loyalist leaning as you think, and your cavalryman Tarleton is not going to help matters.
  10. As just as their cause may be, inciting slaves and indians against your subjects will backfire.

Shout out to Mike Bell at 790 the Zone

27 Wednesday Nov 2013

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Cowpens

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

790 The Zone, Cowpens National Battlefield, Mel Gibson, Mike Bell, The Patriot

The Patriot

The Patriot

I have to give credit to sports talk radio guy Mike Bell from 790 The Zone who today mentioned that he almost stopped at the Cowpens National Battlefield to see “where Mel Gibson beat Tarleton”, but it was too far off I-85. Like most Americans, Bell exclaimed, he preferred his national battlefields just off the highway.

Funny stuff right there.

Taking the Plunge…

15 Tuesday Oct 2013

Posted by Twistification in 1777 Charleville, Banastre Tarleton, Cavalry, Infantry, Musket, Revolutionary War, The Battle of the Hook, Weapons of the Revolution

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Battle of the Hook, reenactment

Battle of the HookAs just about anyone who has checked out my blog would see coming from a mile away, I have finally taken the plunge and will participate in my first reenactment at the Battle of the Hook. I will be joining Patrick O’Kelley’s 2nd North Carolina Regiment this coming weekend. The regiment will be depicting “Mercer’s Select Grenadier Battalion” that saw most of the infantry action during the battle. If predictions hold out, this event may even see the largest contingent of cavalry for a Revolutionary War reenactment ever.

The American victory at ‘The Hook’ shut Cornwallis in Yorktown and threw away the key, effectively ending the British general’s hopes for escape or reinforcements (thanks should also be given to the French fleet). The dreaded Banastre Tarleton partook in the battle and was injured as Mercer’s Select rushed in to support French cavalry.

So there is much to the world of reenactment that I am learning. Random thoughts:

  • The 2nd North Carolina regiment will feed, cloth, arm and shelter both Wesley and I.
  • Patrick O’Kelly will train us upon arrival. With any luck, I’m hoping he won’t break into spats of cursing in German like Von Steuben did.
  • My musket will pass muster this time, although technically the 1777 Charleville was not issued to Continentals. If asked, I’ll stick with the story that I ‘borrowed it’ from the generous French contingent. Or maybe won it in a bet. Not sure yet.
  • The regiment will provide the cartridges. No bullets will be used of course. This statement was made particularly to ease my wife who is concerned about the next bullet point…
  • A period correct Tavern will be present at this event. I will be sure to practice period correct consumption, hopefully not leading to a case of period correct ‘the consumption’.
  • The reenactments will include redoubts and two buildings that will be burnt down during the battle. The 11 year old in me just jumped with joy upon discovering this.
  • Shaved the beard. Sad faces from my wife and 11 year old daughter upon discovering my cleanhsaveness this morning. But worth it to see the confused look on my one and two year old boy’s faces.
  • Must keep out of view my sleeping bag and anything that is not period correct. Once the public is gone however, I plan on taking plenty of pics. Vids too.
  • Gloucester Virginia. 9 hr drive. Ouch.

Sleeping accommodations free of charge thanks to the 2nd North Carolina Regiment:

Sleeping Accommodations

The Seige of South Carolina

05 Thursday Sep 2013

Posted by Twistification in Banastre Tarleton, Charleston, Revolutionary War

≈ 3 Comments

The Siege of CharlestonIt’s not often that the subject matter from this blog crosses streams with another passion of mine. As a Georgia Bulldog alum and rabid college football fan, I look to the first two games of 2013 that feature a matchup between my alma mater and South Carolina’s two top football schools– Clemson and South Carolina.

As I reel from the devastating phycological impact of Georgia’s loss to Clemson last week, I still cling to hope that like the British, the Dawgs will be back to take victory over South Carolina the second time around. Thankfully, unlike The Revolution, I will not have to wait four years for the rematch…

So what does this post have to do with the Revolutionary War (other than Georgia’s band is called ‘The Redcoats’) you ask?

william-moultrieThe state flag of South Carolina is steeped in Revolutionary War symbolism. The crescent moon was established by Colonel William Moultrie. Moultrie’s historic defense of Charleston during the British Naval attack on June 28th 1776 successfully repelled an attacking British force that was unaccustomed to losing battles.

South Carolina FlagAfter the battle, Moultrie’s crescent moon standard became an inspirational symbol of liberty during the war.

Over sixty years later, the palm tree was added as a reference to the hastily laid palm trees that were added to the walls of Fort Sullivan’s Island that day. The soft wood of the trees actually helped absorb (and some claimed to even ricochet) British cannon balls.

But like Georgia, the Redcoats would be back. Charleston fell during the British Southern campaign almost four years later in 1779. No trees would save the residents of Charleston from Henry Clinton and the might of the British Empire.

This week I hope that Georgia Coach Mark Richt will direct his inner Henry Clinton and that quarterback Aaron Murray will summon the leadership of Cornwallis to lead the dawgs to victory this weekend. May running back Todd Gurely run roughshod over the Gamecocks like Banastre Tarleton on a retreating militia unit. May Steve Spurrier suffer from bouts of narcolepsy like Benjamin Lincoln as he gameplans for the Dawgs. May the Georgia Redcoat band play victorious tunes at the end of the day.

An in the words of the immortal Larry Munson, hunker down you harry dawgs.

Spurrier and Lincoln...I think I see a resemblance.

Spurrier and Lincoln…I think I see a resemblance.

Recent Posts

  • Militia Cavalry
  • Road to Guilford Courthouse
  • With Musket & Tomahawk
  • Long time no post, but updates coming
  • Hunting Frock

Categories

  • 1777 Charleville
  • 4th of July
  • Alexander Hamilton
  • AMC
  • Banastre Tarleton
  • Black Powder
  • Black Powder Firearms
  • Bunker Hill
  • Cavalry
  • Charles Lee
  • Charleston
  • Columbus
  • Cornwallis
  • Cowpens
  • Daniel Morgan
  • documentary
  • Duel
  • Founding Fathers
  • Gear
  • George Washington
  • Gerstner
  • Gettysburg
  • Gun Room
  • Infantry
  • King George III
  • Memorial Day
  • Musket
  • Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Nathaniel Greene
  • National Infantry Museum
  • Reboubt
  • reenactment
  • Revolutionary War
  • Rochambeau
  • Slavery
  • Spontoon
  • Stephen Decatur
  • Strategy & Tactics
  • The battle of Cowpens
  • The Battle of the Hook
  • Thomas Paine
  • TURN
  • Uncategorized
  • War of 1812
  • Waterloo
  • Weapons of the Revolution
  • Whiskey Rebellion
  • Yorktown

Blogs I Follow

  • Get The Picture
  • Laura Lee Living
  • TURN to a historian
  • john pavlovitz
  • Swungover*
  • wbahr
  • 43andfatfree Blog
  • this is... The Neighborhood
  • Twistification
  • That's What She Said
  • Past in the Present
  • TrappersWildWest
  • A Woodsrunner's Diary
  • The Long Roll
  • Journal of the American Revolution

Recent Comments

Fawn Gero on ‘The Revenant’ is…
IAC on Cartridge Making Day!
wbahr on Cartridge Making Day!
Immortan joe on Myths of the Revolution: …
Twistification on Questions for an Artiller…

Recent Comments

Fawn Gero on ‘The Revenant’ is…
IAC on Cartridge Making Day!
wbahr on Cartridge Making Day!
Immortan joe on Myths of the Revolution: …
Twistification on Questions for an Artiller…

Blog at WordPress.com.

Get The Picture

Bloviation for the Dawgnation

Laura Lee Living

Experiences in Life & Kitchen

TURN to a historian

Has "TURN: Washington's Spies" left you feeling a little... spy-curious?

john pavlovitz

Stuff That Needs To Be Said

Swungover*

wbahr

4 out of 5 dentists are pulling for me!

43andfatfree Blog

in 2002 I decided to share my weight loss journey! Its been a life struggle. I hope this site helps others who deal with emotional eating!

this is... The Neighborhood

the Story within the Story

Twistification

All Things Revolutionary War

That's What She Said

Clearly, I take myself seriously.

Past in the Present

Blogging American History--News, Books, Museums, Sites, and More

TrappersWildWest

Historian. Artist. Gunmaker.

A Woodsrunner's Diary

All Things Revolutionary War

The Long Roll

Discussions about the American Civil War (1861-1865)

Journal of the American Revolution

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Twistification
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Twistification
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...